THE SURROGACY SOLUTION: WILL RICH & FAMOUS WOMEN WALK AWAY FROM BECOMING PREGNANT?

FOR WOMEN WHOSE FACES AND BODIES ARE THEIR FORTUNE, SURROGACY HELPS THEM GROW FAMILIES WITHOUT STRETCHMARKS, MATERNITY LEAVE, DOUBLE CHINS, VARICOSE VEINS AND UNGAINLY SILHOUETTES. SANGEETA WADDHWANI CALLS OUT A HISTORIC SHIFT WHERE GLAMOROUS WOMEN ARE CHOOSING NURTURE OVER NATURE

The Duchess of Cambridge popped out three royal munchkins without skipping a beat. She had nary a baby bump to worry about, and faced the 24/7 paparazzi looking immaculate in her Buckingham Palace-approved blue chip wardrobe.

Here in India, an as-much-under-media scrutiny Aishwarya Rai Bachchan swelled up half a decade or so after marriage, both with pride and pregnancy poundage, subjecting herself to the age old female script of career, marriage, babies where the latter often takes precedence over every other consideration. Till the pregnancy happened, the ruthless and tasteless desi yellow media went on about her having TB of the uterus, and other idle and evil speculation. It was a bizarre trial by media, as if an actress’ life MUST pan out in a filmi sequence. It never occurred to the largely female newspaper snipers that an actress may choose to NEVER expose her delicate contours to the riotous disruption of a pregnancy. Because Ash was a good middle class girl from suburban Khar, she put herself through the nine yards (read months) of identity sabotage and bore Aaradhya like a badge of honour. Remember how photographers delighted in capturing a much fuller Ash with an almost vanished waistline on the red carpet at Cannes?

A director who cast her in an archetypal role as the Paro of Devdas, even went on record to say “Beautiful women should never become pregnant.”

As is custom in showbiz there were whispers and murmers all over about this fuller version of iconic grace, having lost her IT factor to motherhood.

Now let’s be honest. There definitely is a lot to be said for the price Nature elicits from women of beauty becoming fecund and real, their bodies like rivers in spate, waiting for the harvest of a ripened fetus.

Ash took a five year sabbatical from the headless marionette routine of fittings, rehearsals, light, camera, action, film promotion, and so on. She didn’t think work, wealth, pulchritude and performance in reel life were the only things that mattered.

It was the same with Shilpa Shetty, who put herself through the whole sacrificial spectrum of pregnancy when carrying her first born. Viaan. She had shared with me for a special exclusive cover story, that her muscle tone got so poor and her weight at 80 plus kgs was so daunting..she had trouble squatting and picking up her toddler! So hit the gym she did with a vengeance. But baby no two was a breeze…because another womb manufactured that bun! In Shilpa’s case, she at least tried to put a story to the choice of surrogacy…she had an autoimmune condition that led to several miscarriages. Fair enough. Because surrogacy was a 21st century invention, a new privilege extended to those who could afford delegating pregnancies.

This is where we sit on the edge of an age old value system that demanded pregnancy of a married woman. It was divinely ordained that she offered the gift of new life and family to her spouse.

In centuries past, our elders did not envisage a world where female ambition would pretty much play out on the scale it has. To me, an accurate symbol of this shift, is the bi-continental supernova, Priyanka Chopra Jonas. Everything about her journey takes the tired Feminist debate to exciting questions. Should a woman marry a man a decade younger? Of another culture and nationality? Should a woman dare to be rich and famous across two continents? And my word .. Should she ‘delegate’ pregnancy to a surrogate, so she doesn’t skip a beat in her highly visible line of work? More so because at 38, when she has iconic franchises like the Matrix Ressurections and solo lead roles in Hollywood knocking..this would be a ridiculous time to get inflated, semi-retired and sentimental about growing a fetus in the fashiontastic premium real estate of her body?

Think about it. Yes of course serious commentators on the chilling exploitation of less privileged women becoming fatally ill due to a serial hiring of their wombs, have to be listened to. Authors like Pinky Virani and her book, The Politics of the Womb, raise critical issues on the subject. Legal frameworks and regulation are needed to ensure that surrogacy treats both, the Yashoda and the Devaki, (the nurture mother and the natural mother) fairly.

And one would love to hear what the feminists are thinking, as surrogacy takes consumerism to a new edge. A friend of mine, the singer and yoga exponent, Shweta Shetty, expressed how she felt about how this great new facilitator of motherhood for women in high visibility areas of work. ” I feel the bond built between the fetus and the mother is irreplaceable and cannot be experienced through surrogacy.”

We will be hearing from more women as this blog makes the rounds. What is your take?

THE SURROGACY SOLUTION

Unknown's avatar

Author: Sangeeta Wadhwani_editorspicks11

A lover of life, the written word, and people... not strictly in that order! Have been a writer since I could read and write, and followed through with a dazzling career in mainstream English celebrity and lifestyle journalism with top notch brands and author of four books - all on Amazon!

14 thoughts on “THE SURROGACY SOLUTION: WILL RICH & FAMOUS WOMEN WALK AWAY FROM BECOMING PREGNANT?”

  1. Excellent views .
    Well its is a boon for those who cannot conceive ( read health issues ) . But If deliberately opted just to care your figure and that wealthy and glamorous screen , you are loosing the feeling of motherhood. The most beautiful and ultimate feeling in any woman’s life …

    Like

  2. Keep in mind, a woman’s body was designed to bear a child. When she does not, it increases her risk to breast cancer exponentially. A woman who is breastfeeding her baby and leading an active lifestyle will lose the unsightly kilos in 6-9 months. Not a high price to pay to bond with and provide security and the ideal nutrition to build your baby’s immunity for life. What say?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Very true Bhavna…I think surrogacy helps women who are past their biological prime…or need to keep to huge professional commitments in a business where their bodies have to fit a director’s continuity needs…but otherwise I totally see the logic of what you share!

      Like

  3. Being an adoptive mother, I disagree that maternal bond only comes with giving birth from the womb. I have not only nurtured my 3 month old when but my sisters children when they were born. The connection is of love not of blood. Families are created by love not by blood. So, for whatever reason one chooses surrogacy or adoption, there is no sense in making either case better or worse, let there be love in the heart and nurturing in the hand.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes Aditi…I totally hear you on this and concur…have seen that genuine bonds may have less to do with blood ties…and our mythology showed this in Yashoda’s love for Krishna…and even the demoness Putana who had fleeting maternal feelings for baby Krishna…while trying to poison him with her breast milk.. those feelings took her soul to a better place after Krishna sucked her life force out of her

      Like

  4. Surrogacy is a great option for couples who for multiple reasons can’t bear children or go through pregnancy safely . The glamour industry seems to use it to save time and their bodies! Also a woman’s body has evolved to need to go through the hormonal changes of at least a couple of pregnancies . The lack of this is causing a rise in cancers and other women’s health issues .
    Not to mention this reeks of Socio-economic inequality ! A woman renting our her womb for money ? Another woman buying it because she can ? Sound like the newest profession in the world is exactly like the oldest .
    And finally the body is not just the body it is an energy being with several layers that connect to the baby. The Shamans can look at your aura and tell you if you have had a child because there is a black hole in the aura of a woman who has had a child which is the energy the child draws from you. This hole closes with time and traditional care for the mother. So anyone who thinks that the baby is not carrying an imprint of the surrogate mother is fooling themselves

    Like

  5. Very very interesting..

    But like anything its a choice and a perspective..

    I believe both the below situations are like the two sides of a coin.. not wanting to ruin the money making mill (i.e. ur body) is true but on the flip side not able to conceive the greatest gift in life is equally true.

    It all boils down to what makes you happy; people will speak..well thats their day job 😉

    Like

  6. I feel it’s a choice(it must always be your choice not dictated by society, lecturing on what is right or wrong),to each his own and must be respected .
    About Priyanka Chopra she is 39 she knows what is best for her, not what society thinks is best thing to do.Its her life ,she and her husband have complete right to choose whatever is best for them .Iam not supporting or negative towards surrogacy, it’s a choice .
    Frankly it doesn’t bother me whether woman go for pregnancy naturally or surrogacy,it’s their choice as long it brings them happiness,it’s legal and nobody is abused in the process,it’s fine.

    Like

Leave a comment